Triple
T4897418
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lamb’s Book of Life |
E109714
|
entity |
| Predicate | theologicalDebate |
P53157
|
FINISHED |
| Object | whether names can be blotted out |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: whether names can be blotted out | Statement: [Lamb’s Book of Life, theologicalDebate, whether names can be blotted out]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theologicalDebate Context triple: [Lamb’s Book of Life, theologicalDebate, whether names can be blotted out]
-
A.
religiousControversy
chosen
Indicates a relationship in which entities are involved in a dispute, conflict, or debate specifically concerning religious beliefs, practices, or institutions.
-
B.
theologicalFocus
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
-
C.
theologicalContext
Indicates the religious or doctrinal framework, tradition, or set of beliefs within which something (such as a text, event, or concept) is interpreted or understood.
-
D.
theologicalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to a particular theological type, tradition, or doctrinal category.
-
E.
scripturalBasisDebated
Indicates that whether this action or relationship is supported or justified by authoritative religious scriptures is a matter of dispute or disagreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4410bbf88190aad50d2451c863d6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd706245e48190a61d573438461c30 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c306b188190a08a7856beb76db4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:28 p.m.