Triple

T4896297
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Greek cross E109687 entity
Predicate hasRotationalSymmetryOrder P60478 FINISHED
Object 4 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4 | Statement: [Greek cross, hasRotationalSymmetryOrder, 4]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRotationalSymmetryOrder
Context triple: [Greek cross, hasRotationalSymmetryOrder, 4]
  • A. hasSymmetryGroupOrder
    Indicates that an entity possesses a symmetry group whose total number of distinct symmetry operations equals the given order.
  • B. isMaximallySymmetric
    Indicates that the subject exhibits the highest possible degree of symmetry allowed by the relevant structure, constraints, or context.
  • C. isRotational
    Indicates that one entity moves, transforms, or is oriented by rotating around a point, axis, or center relative to another.
  • D. usesSymmetryGroup
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
  • E. isSymmetrical
    Indicates that an object, pattern, or configuration remains unchanged or mirrored when transformed by a symmetry operation such as reflection, rotation, or inversion.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4410bbf88190aad50d2451c863d6 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd6ffabccc81909115ece1b04e2061 completed March 20, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6c2e7b5c8190b8bf9d616dfa24f0 completed March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd6ff731188190a9903602122d4ff9 completed March 20, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:28 p.m.