Triple
T4876731
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nicholaston |
E109222
|
entity |
| Predicate | near |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Penmaen |
E119196
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Penmaen | Statement: [Nicholaston, near, Penmaen]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Penmaen Context triple: [Nicholaston, near, Penmaen]
-
A.
Penmaen
chosen
Penmaen is a small coastal village on the Gower Peninsula in South Wales, known for its scenic cliffs, beaches, and rural surroundings.
-
B.
Llanberis
Llanberis is a village in Gwynedd, Wales, known as a popular base for exploring Snowdonia and for access to the summit of Mount Snowdon via the Llanberis Path and mountain railway.
-
C.
Barmouth
Barmouth is a seaside town and popular holiday resort on the west coast of Wales, known for its sandy beach and scenic location at the mouth of the Mawddach Estuary.
-
D.
Penygroes
Penygroes is a village in Gwynedd, Wales, historically associated with the slate quarrying industry and serving as a local community hub near Caernarfon.
-
E.
Deganwy
Deganwy is a coastal village in Conwy County Borough, Wales, situated on the Conwy estuary opposite Conwy and near the resort town of Llandudno.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd440e9d64819083e82cf33b4d9570 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6dbbc734819083b28a022e5690d6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:54 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69be67fc50cc819083a475a1de914670 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 9:42 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:27 p.m.