Triple
T4849441
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Permanent Review Tribunal |
E108374
|
entity |
| Predicate | bindingNatureOfDecisions |
P2282
|
FINISHED |
| Object | binding on parties to the dispute |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: binding on parties to the dispute | Statement: [Permanent Review Tribunal, bindingNatureOfDecisions, binding on parties to the dispute]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bindingNatureOfDecisions Context triple: [Permanent Review Tribunal, bindingNatureOfDecisions, binding on parties to the dispute]
-
A.
bindingNatureOfJudgments
chosen
Indicates that judgments or decisions have a compulsory, legally enforceable effect on the parties or entities to which they apply.
-
B.
decisionsSubjectTo
Indicates that certain decisions are constrained by, dependent on, or must comply with specified conditions, approvals, or oversight.
-
C.
decisionsAre
Indicates that certain choices, judgments, or resolutions possess a specified quality, status, or classification.
-
D.
includesDecisionsBy
Indicates that something contains, encompasses, or takes into account decisions made by a specified party or set of parties.
-
E.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4409b264819085ab855f3eb5381a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6ddd17d881909f7731ff2b460e83 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c2557388190a2d15571bacd24f3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:25 p.m.