Triple
T4847084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leopold and Loeb murder trial |
E108315
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedEvidence |
P3168
|
FINISHED |
| Object | confessions of defendants |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: confessions of defendants | Statement: [Leopold and Loeb murder trial, usedEvidence, confessions of defendants]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedEvidence Context triple: [Leopold and Loeb murder trial, usedEvidence, confessions of defendants]
-
A.
usedEvidenceType
chosen
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
B.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
C.
hasNoEvidenceOf
Indicates that there is no supporting proof, data, or documentation confirming the existence or occurrence of the referenced condition, event, or relationship.
-
D.
stanceOnProofs
Indicates the position or attitude an entity holds regarding the use, value, or nature of proofs.
-
E.
hasEvidentials
Indicates that a statement, claim, or information is accompanied by markers specifying the type or source of evidence supporting it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4409b264819085ab855f3eb5381a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6e01872c81909607010c10538ad1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c2375a4819098e16acb982c8fab |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:25 p.m.