Triple

T4847083
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Leopold and Loeb murder trial E108315 entity
Predicate legalArgumentByDefense P36520 FINISHED
Object opposition to death penalty LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: opposition to death penalty | Statement: [Leopold and Loeb murder trial, legalArgumentByDefense, opposition to death penalty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalArgumentByDefense
Context triple: [Leopold and Loeb murder trial, legalArgumentByDefense, opposition to death penalty]
  • A. defenseArgument chosen
    Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
  • B. defendedAs
    Indicates that one entity is presented, argued, or justified as being equivalent to or serving the role of another entity in a defensive or protective context.
  • C. defendantPosition
    Indicates the role, stance, or location that a defendant holds within a legal case or proceeding.
  • D. defendant
    Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
  • E. arguedUnder
    Indicates that one entity presented arguments or conducted a legal case under the supervision, authority, or guidance of another entity (such as a mentor, attorney, or judge).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4409b264819085ab855f3eb5381a completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd6e01872c81909607010c10538ad1 completed March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6c2375a4819098e16acb982c8fab completed March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:25 p.m.