Triple
T4842630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elohim |
E108212
|
entity |
| Predicate | theologicalConnotation |
P59726
|
FINISHED |
| Object | divine power and judgment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: divine power and judgment | Statement: [Elohim, theologicalConnotation, divine power and judgment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theologicalConnotation Context triple: [Elohim, theologicalConnotation, divine power and judgment]
-
A.
theologicalConcept
Indicates that something is a religious or theological idea, doctrine, or principle within a belief system.
-
B.
theologicalContext
Indicates the religious or doctrinal framework, tradition, or set of beliefs within which something (such as a text, event, or concept) is interpreted or understood.
-
C.
theologicalInterpretation
Indicates a relationship where an event, text, or phenomenon is understood or explained through religious or doctrinal beliefs and principles.
-
D.
theologicalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to a particular theological type, tradition, or doctrinal category.
-
E.
theologicalFocus
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4409b264819085ab855f3eb5381a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6e01872c81909607010c10538ad1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c2375a4819098e16acb982c8fab |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd6dfff1488190a32bbb615bfab970 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:25 p.m.