Triple
T4838788
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hezekiah |
E108127
|
entity |
| Predicate | comparativeEvaluation |
P278
|
FINISHED |
| Object | compared favorably to David in faithfulness |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: compared favorably to David in faithfulness | Statement: [Hezekiah, comparativeEvaluation, compared favorably to David in faithfulness]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: comparativeEvaluation Context triple: [Hezekiah, comparativeEvaluation, compared favorably to David in faithfulness]
-
A.
comparisonType
Indicates the specific kind of comparison being made between two or more values or entities (e.g., equality, inequality, ordering, or similarity).
-
B.
comparisonAspect
Indicates that two or more entities are being compared specifically with respect to a particular shared attribute or dimension.
-
C.
isComparedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is evaluated or measured in relation to another to highlight similarities, differences, or relative qualities.
-
D.
notableComparison
Indicates that one entity is being compared to another in a way that is especially significant, remarkable, or worthy of note.
-
E.
evaluationBasis
Indicates the criteria, standards, or reference framework used to judge, assess, or measure something in an evaluation process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43fbe444819085cb970706ef73f7 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6e01872c81909607010c10538ad1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c2375a4819098e16acb982c8fab |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:25 p.m.