Triple

T4835925
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Siege of Vienna (1529) E108058 entity
Predicate hasFollowingEvent P47020 FINISHED
Object continued Ottoman–Habsburg frontier warfare LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: continued Ottoman–Habsburg frontier warfare | Statement: [Siege of Vienna (1529), hasFollowingEvent, continued Ottoman–Habsburg frontier warfare]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFollowingEvent
Context triple: [Siege of Vienna (1529), hasFollowingEvent, continued Ottoman–Habsburg frontier warfare]
  • A. hasPrecedingEvents
    Indicates that one or more events occurred earlier in time or sequence relative to the referenced event.
  • B. hasSubEvent
    Indicates that an event is composed of, or includes as part of its structure, another event that occurs within it.
  • C. hasNearbyEvent
    Indicates that an event occurs close in space or time to the referenced entity.
  • D. hasSubsequent chosen
    Indicates that one entity occurs, appears, or is positioned after another in a defined sequence or order.
  • E. hasEventSeries
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or participates in, a sequence of related events forming a series.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43fbe444819085cb970706ef73f7 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd6ff981fc819080d4466c6fe06cf3 completed March 20, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6c21c7f08190846049d31fdfa144 completed March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:25 p.m.