Triple

T4825433
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tattnall County E107811 entity
Predicate hasBorderWith P224 FINISHED
Object Liberty County E102340 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Liberty County | Statement: [Tattnall County, hasBorderWith, Liberty County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Liberty County
Context triple: [Tattnall County, hasBorderWith, Liberty County]
  • A. Liberty County chosen
    Liberty County is a coastal county in southeastern Georgia known for its historic communities, military presence at Fort Stewart, and proximity to the Atlantic shoreline.
  • B. Liberty County
    Liberty County is a county in southeastern Texas that forms part of the Greater Houston metropolitan region.
  • C. Liberty County
    Liberty County is a sparsely populated rural county in the Florida Panhandle known for its extensive forests and natural areas.
  • D. Lowndes County
    Lowndes County is a rural county in central Alabama known for its significant role in the American civil rights movement, particularly during the Selma to Montgomery marches.
  • E. Bailey County
    Bailey County is a rural county in the western Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and small communities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43fac8188190803f0327190621e4 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd6cadb2bc81909455149e46eb593a completed March 20, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69be89d3358c8190bb85ec1835a9f095 completed March 21, 2026, 12:06 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:24 p.m.