Triple

T482429
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject House Minority Leader E9198 entity
Predicate powerDependsOn P14894 FINISHED
Object size and cohesion of the minority party caucus LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: size and cohesion of the minority party caucus | Statement: [House Minority Leader, powerDependsOn, size and cohesion of the minority party caucus]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: powerDependsOn
Context triple: [House Minority Leader, powerDependsOn, size and cohesion of the minority party caucus]
  • A. suppliesPowerTo
    Indicates that one entity provides electrical or energy power required for the operation or functioning of another entity.
  • B. powerDirection
    Indicates the direction in which power, influence, or control flows from one entity to another.
  • C. hasPower
    Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
  • D. inPowerSince
    Indicates the point in time from which an entity has continuously held a position of authority or power.
  • E. hasPowerSource
    Indicates that an entity derives its operational energy or functionality from a specified power source.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7ff81708190b0507a24a997232c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2f05a7f6c819082b4a5a3e69468a6 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edf321288190b5d560f75782c2cb completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ef4030608190b39852b347a505ca completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.