Triple
T4771338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | hertz |
E105932
|
entity |
| Predicate | inverseOf |
P21517
|
FINISHED |
| Object | second per cycle |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second per cycle | Statement: [hertz, inverseOf, second per cycle]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inverseOf Context triple: [hertz, inverseOf, second per cycle]
-
A.
isInverseOf
chosen
Indicates that one relation reverses the direction of another, so that if the original relates A to B, its inverse relates B to A.
-
B.
inverseImage
Indicates the mapping from a set of outputs back to all inputs that are related to those outputs under a given function or relation.
-
C.
inverseFlattening
Indicates the reciprocal of the flattening ratio of an ellipsoid, expressing how much it deviates from a perfect sphere.
-
D.
inverselyProportionalTo
Indicates that as the value of one quantity increases, the value of the other quantity decreases in such a way that their product remains constant.
-
E.
reversed
Indicates that the direction or order of a previously defined relationship or sequence between entities is inverted.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f226fc8190b867cc249c2a9042 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd655e5dcc8190a932be9b1baaffb2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6229d8448190a271719e5e30fd82 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:21 p.m.