Triple
T4767592
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Massacre of the Innocents |
E105849
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicityDebate |
P59206
|
FINISHED |
| Object | subject of scholarly debate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject of scholarly debate | Statement: [Massacre of the Innocents, historicityDebate, subject of scholarly debate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicityDebate Context triple: [Massacre of the Innocents, historicityDebate, subject of scholarly debate]
-
A.
heritageDebate
Indicates a discussion or dispute concerning the preservation, interpretation, or value of cultural or historical heritage.
-
B.
historicalExistence
Indicates that an entity actually existed at some point in real-world history, as opposed to being fictional, hypothetical, or mythological.
-
C.
historical
Indicates that the subject has existed, occurred, or been relevant in the past rather than in the present or future.
-
D.
historicalEvidence
Indicates that there exists documented or otherwise verifiable information supporting the occurrence, authenticity, or truth of a past event, state, or relationship between entities.
-
E.
historicalIssue
Indicates that one entity is a past or previously existing edition, version, or instance of another entity, typically within a chronological sequence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f226fc8190b867cc249c2a9042 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd686ef1b08190ad60375592c9d6c0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd622807f881908e4bcb14f7731bac |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd686dc7b88190b41e8a362701080d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:21 p.m.