Triple

T4765243
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paxos consensus algorithm E105793 entity
Predicate usesRole P161 FINISHED
Object proposer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proposer | Statement: [Paxos consensus algorithm, usesRole, proposer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesRole
Context triple: [Paxos consensus algorithm, usesRole, proposer]
  • A. hasRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is assigned a specific role or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. requiresRole
    Indicates that performing an action or accessing a resource is contingent on the subject having a specified role or set of roles.
  • C. supportsRole
    Indicates that one entity provides the necessary functionality, resources, or conditions for another entity to perform or occupy a specific role.
  • D. definesRole
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the role, function, or position of another entity within a given context.
  • E. servesRole
    Indicates that one entity performs, fulfills, or occupies a particular function, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f226fc8190b867cc249c2a9042 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd686ef1b08190ad60375592c9d6c0 completed March 20, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd622807f881908e4bcb14f7731bac completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:21 p.m.