Triple
T4765229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paxos consensus algorithm |
E105793
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fault-tolerant protocol |
C993
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: fault-tolerant protocol Context triple: [Paxos consensus algorithm, instanceOf, fault-tolerant protocol]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
C.
state protocol
A state protocol is a formal set of rules and procedures that governs how a state’s institutions, officials, and symbols interact internally and with other states to ensure order, recognition, and continuity.
-
D.
communication protocol
chosen
A communication protocol is a defined set of rules and formats that enable reliable, structured exchange of data between two or more communicating entities in a networked system.
-
E.
packet-switched protocol
A packet-switched protocol is a communication method that breaks data into discrete packets, routes them independently across a network, and reassembles them at the destination for efficient and robust data transfer.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f226fc8190b867cc249c2a9042 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:21 p.m.