Triple

T4754279
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Adversus Marcionem E105549 entity
Predicate theologicalPositionOpposed P10004 FINISHED
Object dualism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dualism | Statement: [Adversus Marcionem, theologicalPositionOpposed, dualism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theologicalPositionOpposed
Context triple: [Adversus Marcionem, theologicalPositionOpposed, dualism]
  • A. doctrinalOppositionFrom
    Indicates a relationship where one party holds or expresses doctrinal disagreement or opposition toward another party or their teachings.
  • B. theologicallyContrastedWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities are set in opposition or compared as differing in theological beliefs, doctrines, or interpretations.
  • C. doctrinalStance
    Indicates the specific set of doctrines, beliefs, or official teachings that an entity adheres to or promotes.
  • D. opposedChurchPolity
    Indicates that one party actively resisted, disagreed with, or worked against the system of church governance or organizational structure associated with another.
  • E. hasTheologicalIssue
    Indicates that one entity raises, involves, or is associated with a specific theological problem, concern, or point of doctrinal contention in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f07fa48190954317d01600994a completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd64e882b08190b100582e6d2e0334 completed March 20, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6223defc8190823665a6592c1154 completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:20 p.m.