Triple
T4742659
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Radziejowa |
E105281
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProminenceStatus |
P37605
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dominant peak of Radziejowa Range |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dominant peak of Radziejowa Range | Statement: [Radziejowa, hasProminenceStatus, dominant peak of Radziejowa Range]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProminenceStatus Context triple: [Radziejowa, hasProminenceStatus, dominant peak of Radziejowa Range]
-
A.
hasProminence
Indicates that one entity stands out in importance, visibility, or influence relative to others within a given context.
-
B.
prominenceStatus
chosen
Indicates the degree to which something is notable, distinguished, or stands out in importance or visibility relative to others.
-
C.
hasMinimumProminence
Indicates that an entity meets or exceeds a specified threshold level of prominence or importance within a given context.
-
D.
hasProminenceParent
Indicates that one entity derives its prominence, importance, or highlighted status from another entity that serves as its parent in a prominence hierarchy.
-
E.
prominence
Indicates that an entity stands out in importance, visibility, or influence relative to others within a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43ef87a48190a5bc3600711aa032 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd64a7153881909eac451fc7566d25 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6221c3b881908604f35f8de6f16b |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:19 p.m.