Triple

T4713749
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grand and General Council E104579 entity
Predicate hasLegitimacyFrom P39443 FINISHED
Object popular elections LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: popular elections | Statement: [Grand and General Council, hasLegitimacyFrom, popular elections]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegitimacyFrom
Context triple: [Grand and General Council, hasLegitimacyFrom, popular elections]
  • A. legitimizedBy
    Indicates that something gains legal, formal, or social validity as a result of the authority, action, or endorsement of another entity.
  • B. hasLegalAuthorityFrom
    Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
  • C. hasLegalForceFrom
    Indicates that one legal instrument, decision, or norm derives its binding legal effect or enforceability from another specified source.
  • D. authorityLegitimacyBasis chosen
    Indicates the foundational source or justification that makes an authority’s power or right to rule recognized as valid or legitimate.
  • E. hasLegalForceIn
    Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43ec4a348190bc41afae43375e71 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd680beb508190b3d74e20e1c64405 completed March 20, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd621ddcd88190903288566f5e5dab completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:18 p.m.