Triple

T4684481
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gaziantep Castle E103885 entity
Predicate underRestoration P13045 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Gaziantep Castle, underRestoration, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underRestoration
Context triple: [Gaziantep Castle, underRestoration, yes]
  • A. hasRestoration chosen
    Indicates that an entity has undergone, is undergoing, or is associated with a process of repair, renewal, or restoration.
  • B. restored
    Indicates that an entity has returned another entity to a previous or improved state, condition, or position after damage, loss, or alteration.
  • C. attemptedRestoration
    Indicates an action where an entity makes an effort to restore or return another entity to a previous or desired state, condition, or form, regardless of whether the restoration succeeds.
  • D. restoredInPart
    Indicates that something has been brought back to a previous or improved state, but only partially rather than fully.
  • E. partiallyRestored
    Indicates that an entity has been brought back toward a previous or original state, but the restoration is incomplete or only partially achieved.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43debbf08190b4bc372e286ec234 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd67c9c3c08190a6c4944cdd1362a8 completed March 20, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6217e0088190836570522e324dc6 completed March 20, 2026, 3:04 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:16 p.m.