Triple
T4681586
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roger Brooke Taney |
E103814
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPhilosophyAssociatedWith |
P17220
|
FINISHED |
| Object | states' rights |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: states' rights | Statement: [Roger Brooke Taney, legalPhilosophyAssociatedWith, states' rights]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPhilosophyAssociatedWith Context triple: [Roger Brooke Taney, legalPhilosophyAssociatedWith, states' rights]
-
A.
legalPhilosophy
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
-
B.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
C.
jurisprudenceDiscussedIn
Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
-
D.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
E.
primaryJurisprudentialSchool
chosen
Indicates the main school of legal or jurisprudential thought with which an entity is affiliated or that it primarily follows.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43debbf08190b4bc372e286ec234 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd67c9c3c08190a6c4944cdd1362a8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6217e0088190836570522e324dc6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:16 p.m.