Triple
T4678687
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Modoc County, California |
E103744
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nevada |
E2834
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nevada | Statement: [Modoc County, California, borderWith, Nevada]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nevada Context triple: [Modoc County, California, borderWith, Nevada]
-
A.
Nevada
chosen
Nevada is a western U.S. state known for its vast deserts, legalized gambling, and the entertainment hub of Las Vegas.
-
B.
Nevada
Nevada is a small city in western Missouri known as the county seat of Vernon County and for its historic downtown and regional agricultural economy.
-
C.
Nevada, Texas
Nevada, Texas is a small rural city in Collin County known for its quiet residential character within the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
-
D.
Nevada Territory
Nevada Territory was a 19th-century organized incorporated territory of the United States that preceded the state of Nevada, known for its mining boom and role in the American West.
-
E.
D. Nev.
D. Nev. is the standard legal abbreviation for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, a federal trial court within the Ninth Circuit.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43dda32c8190938b37744ca270fc |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd636acffc819094e03c5bb53203d8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69be0349e89c8190a94e72bdc1e4e59f |
completed | March 21, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:16 p.m.