Triple
T4674838
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fort Clatsop |
E103652
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalAbandonment |
P37690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | March 1806 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: March 1806 | Statement: [Fort Clatsop, originalAbandonment, March 1806]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalAbandonment Context triple: [Fort Clatsop, originalAbandonment, March 1806]
-
A.
abandonment
chosen
Indicates the act of one party leaving, forsaking, or giving up responsibility for another party or thing.
-
B.
abandonmentType
Indicates the specific manner or category of how something or someone was abandoned in the described situation.
-
C.
abandonedBy
Indicates that one entity has been deserted, forsaken, or left behind by another entity that was previously present, responsible, or involved.
-
D.
abandonedIn
Indicates that one entity was left behind or deserted in the location or context specified by another entity.
-
E.
abandonedReason
Indicates the reason or cause for which something was abandoned, discontinued, or given up.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43dda32c8190938b37744ca270fc |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd67c9c3c08190a6c4944cdd1362a8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6217e0088190836570522e324dc6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:15 p.m.