Triple

T4620696
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Executive Order of the President of the United States E100972 entity
Predicate canBeChallengedOnGrounds P16122 FINISHED
Object unconstitutionality LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unconstitutionality | Statement: [Executive Order of the President of the United States, canBeChallengedOnGrounds, unconstitutionality]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeChallengedOnGrounds
Context triple: [Executive Order of the President of the United States, canBeChallengedOnGrounds, unconstitutionality]
  • A. canBeChallengedOn chosen
    Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
  • B. canBeAppealedTo
    Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
  • C. hasGrounds
    Indicates that one entity possesses or includes a physical area of land or outdoor space associated with it.
  • D. mayBeChallengedBy
    Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be opposed, questioned, or contested by another entity.
  • E. canBeSuedFor
    Indicates that one party is legally liable or potentially subject to legal action by another party for a specified cause or wrongdoing.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43cf363c819087fd5ab441b4a3f4 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd59e560f481908abb1a97b4ff5795 completed March 20, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd5231db7c8190b38d4fdbad8bf842 completed March 20, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:12 p.m.