Triple
T4619093
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kaus Media |
E100935
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAlternativeName |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Delta Sagittarii |
E463799
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Delta Sagittarii | Statement: [Kaus Media, hasAlternativeName, Delta Sagittarii]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Delta Sagittarii Context triple: [Kaus Media, hasAlternativeName, Delta Sagittarii]
-
A.
Delta Sagittarii
chosen
Delta Sagittarii is a bright giant star in the constellation Sagittarius, forming part of the prominent asterism known as the Teapot.
-
B.
Lambda Sagittarii
Lambda Sagittarii is a bright star in the constellation Sagittarius that marks the top of the Teapot asterism.
-
C.
Phi Sagittarii
Phi Sagittarii is a bright B-type giant star in the constellation Sagittarius, notable as one of the stars forming the asterism known as the Teapot.
-
D.
Gamma Sagittarii
Gamma Sagittarii is a bright star in the constellation Sagittarius that forms part of the asterism known as the Teapot.
-
E.
Sigma Sagittarii
Sigma Sagittarii is a bright blue-white giant star in the constellation Sagittarius, marking one of the prominent points of the Teapot asterism.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cf363c819087fd5ab441b4a3f4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd59e3e6948190925e2cfad20dcc8c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69be922507408190bf3923699da57d95 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 12:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:12 p.m.