Triple
T4614195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Match Group |
E100826
|
entity |
| Predicate | brandPortfolioType |
P46877
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multi-brand online dating portfolio |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multi-brand online dating portfolio | Statement: [Match Group, brandPortfolioType, multi-brand online dating portfolio]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandPortfolioType Context triple: [Match Group, brandPortfolioType, multi-brand online dating portfolio]
-
A.
brandPortfolioSize
Indicates the number of distinct brands included within an entity’s overall brand portfolio.
-
B.
portfolioOf
Indicates that one entity is the collection of investments, works, or assets that are owned, managed, or represented by another entity.
-
C.
typicalPortfolio
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the standard or representative portfolio associated with another entity (such as a person, account, or organization).
-
D.
positionInBrandPortfolio
Indicates the relative role or rank that a brand holds within a company’s overall brand portfolio.
-
E.
brandFocus
Indicates that a brand primarily concentrates its efforts, messaging, or resources on a particular target, theme, or market segment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cf363c819087fd5ab441b4a3f4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd59c2678c8190ab8f9420e866521d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd522e2d5c8190937d0b5574f78f99 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:12 p.m.