Triple
T4609012
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inchcape |
E100507
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicallyNotedAs |
P22
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dangerous to shipping |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dangerous to shipping | Statement: [Inchcape, historicallyNotedAs, dangerous to shipping]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyNotedAs Context triple: [Inchcape, historicallyNotedAs, dangerous to shipping]
-
A.
historicalNotability
Indicates that an entity is recognized as having significant importance, influence, or prominence in history.
-
B.
historicallyRecognizedAs
Indicates that an entity has been acknowledged or designated under a particular name, status, or role during a past historical period.
-
C.
historicallyBorneBy
Indicates that an entity has carried, possessed, or used another entity (such as a name, title, or symbol) at some point in the past.
-
D.
historicallyConsidered
Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
-
E.
notableFor
chosen
Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cce1e08190a07d53af6a9b6c24 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd599f08d88190ad4bed8bafb592cd |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd522e2d5c8190937d0b5574f78f99 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:12 p.m.