Triple

T4604755
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Count of Dreux E100404 entity
Predicate feudalType P57399 FINISHED
Object hereditary fief LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hereditary fief | Statement: [Count of Dreux, feudalType, hereditary fief]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: feudalType
Context triple: [Count of Dreux, feudalType, hereditary fief]
  • A. isFeudal
    Indicates that one entity holds a feudal relationship to another, typically involving hierarchical obligations such as land tenure, service, or allegiance.
  • B. feudalStatus
    Indicates the hierarchical social or legal position an entity holds within a feudal system, such as lord, vassal, or serf.
  • C. associatedWithFeudalSystem
    Indicates a relationship in which something is connected, linked, or relevant to the structures, practices, or institutions of a feudal system.
  • D. laterFeudalStatus
    Indicates that one entity held a particular feudal status or rank at a later time than another entity or than an earlier status.
  • E. feudalCenter
    Indicates that a location serves as the primary seat of authority, administration, or power within a feudal system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43cce1e08190a07d53af6a9b6c24 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd5999f9c88190a43309573df61159 completed March 20, 2026, 2:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd522c811c81909aae4feadae33174 completed March 20, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd56b5f4648190834eafa666d53caa completed March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:12 p.m.