Triple
T4579963
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | We Thought It Was Oil But It Was Blood |
E101829
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesSymbolismOf |
P129
|
FINISHED |
| Object | oil as blood |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oil as blood | Statement: [We Thought It Was Oil But It Was Blood, usesSymbolismOf, oil as blood]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSymbolismOf Context triple: [We Thought It Was Oil But It Was Blood, usesSymbolismOf, oil as blood]
-
A.
symbolizes
chosen
Indicates that one entity stands for, represents, or is used as a sign for another entity, concept, or idea.
-
B.
emblemSymbolism
Indicates that one entity serves as an emblem whose design or features symbolically represent or convey meanings about another entity.
-
C.
cosmicSymbolism
Indicates a relationship where one entity symbolically represents or embodies cosmic, universal, or celestial principles in relation to another.
-
D.
hasAllegoricalFigures
Indicates that a work, scene, or element includes figures that symbolically represent abstract ideas, concepts, or moral qualities.
-
E.
iconographyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of visual symbolism or imagery used to represent something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43d4ce208190b53158c882b222e3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd58e3e028819083c4662deb9f3c03 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5228b70c8190ac48705e35a710c1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:10 p.m.