Triple
T4575722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Accounting Research Bulletins |
E123136
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusAfterSupersession |
P58063
|
FINISHED |
| Object | retained for historical reference |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: retained for historical reference | Statement: [Accounting Research Bulletins, statusAfterSupersession, retained for historical reference]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusAfterSupersession Context triple: [Accounting Research Bulletins, statusAfterSupersession, retained for historical reference]
-
A.
wasSupersededBy
Indicates that one entity has been replaced or made obsolete by another entity that takes over its role or function.
-
B.
successorTerritorialStatus
Indicates the territorial status or jurisdiction that directly follows and replaces a previous territorial status in a succession or transition.
-
C.
successorUse
Indicates that one entity is used or applied as the subsequent or follow-up use of another entity in a sequence or lifecycle.
-
D.
successorReceives
Indicates that a successor entity obtains or is granted something (such as rights, assets, or responsibilities) from a predecessor.
-
E.
abolishedAfter
Indicates that one entity was abolished at a later time than another entity was abolished.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46466c7081909d07f36be2d08804 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd58dfe3508190b21836079e951a3c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5228b70c8190ac48705e35a710c1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56b4a9508190acdb888eef18f1ee |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:10 p.m.