Triple
T4555256
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joomla! |
E120463
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsUpdateSystem |
P57999
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Joomla!, supportsUpdateSystem, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsUpdateSystem Context triple: [Joomla!, supportsUpdateSystem, yes]
-
A.
supportedSystem
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility, functionality, or operational support for another system.
-
B.
supportsInstallation
Indicates that one entity is capable of enabling, handling, or being compatible with the installation of another entity.
-
C.
softwareUpdateModel
Indicates that one entity serves as the model, specification, or type definition used to perform or describe a software update on another entity.
-
D.
upgradeEligibility
Indicates whether an entity qualifies to move from its current version, level, or plan to a higher or more advanced one under defined criteria.
-
E.
upgradeMethod
Indicates the method or process by which something is improved, updated, or elevated to a higher level or version.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4636f1648190a701445c2fcd9c17 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5813af948190b10b02dadf6496bf |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5223423c81908317351b58cff5f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56b4a9508190acdb888eef18f1ee |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.