Triple
T4552305
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hardy–Weinberg principle |
E120393
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | equilibrium model |
C324
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: equilibrium model Context triple: [Hardy–Weinberg principle, instanceOf, equilibrium model]
-
A.
theoretical model
chosen
A theoretical model is an abstract, simplified representation of a system or phenomenon used to explain, predict, or understand its behavior based on underlying principles and assumptions.
-
B.
gravitational equilibrium point
A gravitational equilibrium point is a location in space where the gravitational forces and orbital motion of a small object balance so that it can remain in a stable or semi-stable position relative to larger bodies.
-
C.
equivalent circuit model
An equivalent circuit model is a simplified representation of an electrical network that uses idealized components (such as resistors, capacitors, and inductors) arranged to replicate the behavior of a more complex or real-world system.
-
D.
bargaining solution concept
A bargaining solution concept is a formal rule or principle that specifies how two or more parties should divide the benefits of cooperation given their feasible payoffs and disagreement outcomes.
-
E.
balance of power system
A balance of power system is an international relations arrangement in which states form shifting alliances and counterweights so that no single actor becomes dominant enough to threaten the independence or security of the others.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4636f1648190a701445c2fcd9c17 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.