Triple
T4546247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Latin Americanism |
E110053
|
entity |
| Predicate | fieldOfDebate |
P57644
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international relations of the Americas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: international relations of the Americas | Statement: [Latin Americanism, fieldOfDebate, international relations of the Americas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fieldOfDebate Context triple: [Latin Americanism, fieldOfDebate, international relations of the Americas]
-
A.
partOfDebate
Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or participant within a larger debate or argumentative exchange.
-
B.
inAcademicDebate
Indicates that one entity is engaged in a formal, scholarly argument or discussion with another entity, typically following academic norms and methods of reasoning.
-
C.
languageOfDebate
Indicates that a specified language is the one used for conducting a particular debate.
-
D.
hasLongTermDebateOn
Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
-
E.
majorDebateSeries
Indicates a relationship where an event or program is part of a prominent, recurring series of formal debates.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4412524c8190be5bcc9ddee91848 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd57d761cc8190a7c8bdef6d130b5d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5220e40481908ca2d7e2c43d8531 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56f6e75481909c487a94a2c2d0ba |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m.