Triple
T4543986
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charles O. Finley |
E110003
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedTeamFeature |
P57625
|
FINISHED |
| Object | white shoes for players |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: white shoes for players | Statement: [Charles O. Finley, introducedTeamFeature, white shoes for players]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedTeamFeature Context triple: [Charles O. Finley, introducedTeamFeature, white shoes for players]
-
A.
introducedTeam
Indicates that one entity formally presented or brought another entity (a team) to the attention of a third party or context for the first time.
-
B.
supportsTeam
Indicates that one entity provides backing, assistance, or endorsement to a particular team.
-
C.
integratedTeam
Indicates that multiple parties work together as a single, coordinated unit with shared goals, processes, and responsibilities.
-
D.
newTeam
Indicates that an entity forms, joins, or is associated with a newly created team.
-
E.
featuredTeam
Indicates that a particular team is highlighted or given special prominence in a given context or presentation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4412524c8190be5bcc9ddee91848 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd57d517e881909c3d23ed4453b0a7 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5220e40481908ca2d7e2c43d8531 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56f6e75481909c487a94a2c2d0ba |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m.