Triple
T4524813
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kyoto Protocol |
E103350
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyCategory |
P57232
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Annex B Parties with quantified commitments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Annex B Parties with quantified commitments | Statement: [Kyoto Protocol, partyCategory, Annex B Parties with quantified commitments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partyCategory Context triple: [Kyoto Protocol, partyCategory, Annex B Parties with quantified commitments]
-
A.
party
Indicates that an entity participates as a side or participant in an event, agreement, or situation.
-
B.
typicalParty
Indicates that an entity is a usual, standard, or characteristic participant in a given type of event, situation, or relationship.
-
C.
partyLed
Indicates that one entity serves as the leader or head of a particular party, organization, or group.
-
D.
sponsorParty
Indicates that one party provides support, typically financial or promotional, to another party, often in exchange for association or visibility.
-
E.
typeOfEvent
Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific kind or category of event.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43dba59881908cf59b31df8c7ae1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5773341c8190bf27745feb863575 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd521cf77c819083852de3094d1377 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56b3e4c88190a7ade3d0ed0ab606 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:03 p.m.