Triple
T4524195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Ministers without portfolio (Germany) |
E103337
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVotingRightInCabinet |
P29050
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Federal Ministers without portfolio (Germany), hasVotingRightInCabinet, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVotingRightInCabinet Context triple: [Federal Ministers without portfolio (Germany), hasVotingRightInCabinet, true]
-
A.
mayHaveCastingVote
Indicates that an entity is permitted to exercise a casting (tie-breaking) vote in a decision-making process.
-
B.
hasVotingPower
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses the authority or capacity to participate in a decision-making or electoral process by casting votes.
-
C.
hasElectoralDignityIn
Indicates that an entity holds or possesses electoral authority, status, or office within a specified political or electoral jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasCouncilSeat
Indicates that an entity holds a position or seat on a governing council.
-
E.
hasMinisterialSeat
Indicates that a governmental or administrative body holds its official ministerial seat or headquarters at a particular location.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43dba59881908cf59b31df8c7ae1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5773341c8190bf27745feb863575 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd521cf77c819083852de3094d1377 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:03 p.m.