Triple
T4519370
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Palika Bazaar |
E103227
|
entity |
| Predicate | bargaining |
P34326
|
FINISHED |
| Object | common |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: common | Statement: [Palika Bazaar, bargaining, common]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bargaining Context triple: [Palika Bazaar, bargaining, common]
-
A.
negotiation
Indicates a process in which two or more parties communicate and make offers and counteroffers to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
-
B.
negotiationAssociatedWith
Indicates a relationship where a negotiation is connected to, involves, or is conducted by a particular entity (such as a person, organization, or group).
-
C.
negotiationTopic
Indicates that the associated entities are engaged in a negotiation specifically concerning the referenced topic or subject matter.
-
D.
typeOfNegotiation
Indicates the specific kind or category of negotiation process that characterizes the interaction between the involved parties.
-
E.
negotiationMechanism
chosen
Indicates a process or method through which parties communicate and bargain to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43dba59881908cf59b31df8c7ae1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5747e90c81908fa112ecace699a9 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd521abea48190b3e758a1f98dd55e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:02 p.m.