Triple
T4510720
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roger Craig |
E102045
|
entity |
| Predicate | eraManagedIn |
P57088
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1980s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1980s | Statement: [Roger Craig, eraManagedIn, 1980s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: eraManagedIn Context triple: [Roger Craig, eraManagedIn, 1980s]
-
A.
managedIn
Indicates that one entity is administered, operated, or overseen within the scope, control, or jurisdiction of another entity.
-
B.
isManagedFor
Indicates that one entity is administered, overseen, or controlled on behalf of another entity or purpose.
-
C.
managedAs
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or handled in the same way or under the same policies, procedures, or classification as another entity.
-
D.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
E.
managedTo
Indicates that an entity successfully accomplished or achieved a particular action or outcome, often despite difficulty or obstacles.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43d6251c81909deecce3e6e9d69c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5712b9308190876c117b50d12635 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5218afb4819087c99e0a1f22e137 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56b3e4c88190a7ade3d0ed0ab606 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:01 p.m.