Triple
T450870
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lamarckism |
E7124
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicallyReevaluatedIn |
P13351
|
FINISHED |
| Object | context of epigenetics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: context of epigenetics | Statement: [Lamarckism, historicallyReevaluatedIn, context of epigenetics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyReevaluatedIn Context triple: [Lamarckism, historicallyReevaluatedIn, context of epigenetics]
-
A.
historicallyIn
Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
-
B.
historicalAssessment
Indicates an evaluation or judgment of something based on its historical context, significance, or development over time.
-
C.
isHistoric
Indicates that something has significant importance or relevance in history, often due to its age, impact, or role in past events.
-
D.
historicallyInterpretedBy
Indicates that something (such as an event, text, or phenomenon) has been given meaning, explanation, or understanding by a particular historian, group, or interpretive tradition over time.
-
E.
reassessedAfter
Indicates that one entity is evaluated or reviewed again at a time point that occurs after another specified event or assessment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e4676c81909ea0dbdecac0687c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ef835ae881908884dcc3a46af951 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2ede3187c8190a7ced078f0ec3476 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2eeba8a488190986cc7381332f783 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.