Triple

T448803
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Phaedo E7081 entity
Predicate containsArgument P11236 FINISHED
Object argument from opposites LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: argument from opposites | Statement: [Phaedo, containsArgument, argument from opposites]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsArgument
Context triple: [Phaedo, containsArgument, argument from opposites]
  • A. hasParameter
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific parameter that defines or constrains some aspect of its behavior, configuration, or characteristics.
  • B. includesElement chosen
    Indicates that one collection, set, or structure contains a specified element as a member or component.
  • C. containsCharacter
    Indicates that one entity includes a specific character as part of its content or composition.
  • D. hasTerm
    Indicates that an entity includes, is associated with, or is defined by a specific term or condition.
  • E. argumentType
    Indicates that one entity serves as a specific semantic or syntactic argument role (such as subject, object, or complement) in relation to another entity or event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e4676c81909ea0dbdecac0687c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ef6755a08190a057e72279b70456 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2ede1a1108190a4a06b3416ae6156 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.