Triple

T4477231
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ancient Egyptian religion E100036 entity
Predicate viewsPharaohAs P56785 FINISHED
Object divine king LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: divine king | Statement: [Ancient Egyptian religion, viewsPharaohAs, divine king]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewsPharaohAs
Context triple: [Ancient Egyptian religion, viewsPharaohAs, divine king]
  • A. majorPharaoh
    Indicates that the subject is recognized as a principal or highly significant pharaoh in relation to the object (such as a period, dynasty, or context).
  • B. associatedWithPharaoh
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity has a connection, link, or involvement with a pharaoh, such as through service, rule, influence, or historical association.
  • C. pharaohOfBuilder
    Indicates a relationship where a pharaoh is the ruler under whose authority or during whose reign a particular structure or monument was built.
  • D. cultTitleOfPharaoh
    Indicates that the object is the cultic or religious title held by the pharaoh specified as the subject.
  • E. nameInHieroglyphs
    Indicates that an entity’s name is written or represented using hieroglyphic script.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b34553cbe48190afa8ac1cac285b86 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b35728ed508190ba0e882fa62d8848 completed March 13, 2026, 12:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b3563d63008190816e37027e761375 completed March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b35727a8ac819090420bd3e2cfbcf1 completed March 13, 2026, 12:15 a.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:35 p.m.