Triple
T4470514
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DDPG |
E98481
|
entity |
| Predicate | criticObjective |
P56725
|
FINISHED |
| Object | minimize Bellman error |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: minimize Bellman error | Statement: [DDPG, criticObjective, minimize Bellman error]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticObjective Context triple: [DDPG, criticObjective, minimize Bellman error]
-
A.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
-
B.
usedToCritique
Indicates that something is employed as a means to analyze, evaluate, or express disapproval of something else.
-
C.
criticizedConstruct
Indicates that one entity expressed disapproval or negative judgment about another entity’s constructed work, idea, or creation.
-
D.
critiquesConcept
Indicates that one entity analyzes, evaluates, or challenges the ideas or principles represented by another entity.
-
E.
criticizedFor
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b356f9afc48190acb50c45a310e072 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.