Triple
T4470253
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A2C |
E98476
|
entity |
| Predicate | criticOutputs |
P56717
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state-value estimate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state-value estimate | Statement: [A2C, criticOutputs, state-value estimate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticOutputs Context triple: [A2C, criticOutputs, state-value estimate]
-
A.
usedToCritique
Indicates that something is employed as a means to analyze, evaluate, or express disapproval of something else.
-
B.
movementCritic
Indicates a relationship where one entity critiques, evaluates, or expresses disapproval of a particular movement (such as a social, political, or artistic movement).
-
C.
hasNotableCritic
Indicates that one entity serves as a significant or widely recognized critic of another entity.
-
D.
criticalReception
Indicates how a work, performance, or product is evaluated and responded to by critics or professional reviewers.
-
E.
hasCriticism
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b356f9afc48190acb50c45a310e072 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.