Triple

T4470249
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A2C E98476 entity
Predicate usesObjective P56715 FINISHED
Object policy gradient objective LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: policy gradient objective | Statement: [A2C, usesObjective, policy gradient objective]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesObjective
Context triple: [A2C, usesObjective, policy gradient objective]
  • A. objectiveIncludes
    Indicates that a broader objective encompasses or contains a specific sub-objective, component, or element as part of its scope.
  • B. followsObjective
    Indicates that one entity pursues, adheres to, or acts in accordance with the goal, plan, or objective defined by another entity.
  • C. notableObjective
    Indicates that an entity has a significant, distinguished, or widely recognized goal, purpose, or target associated with it.
  • D. opponentObjective
    Indicates that one entity is the target or goal that an opposing entity aims to counter, defeat, or prevent from succeeding.
  • E. protectionObjective
    Indicates that one entity has the goal or purpose of safeguarding, defending, or preserving another entity or its interests.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac completed March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b completed March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b356f9afc48190acb50c45a310e072 completed March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.