Triple
T4467050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bethany Hamilton |
E98403
|
entity |
| Predicate | returnedToCompetition |
P56690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2004 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2004 | Statement: [Bethany Hamilton, returnedToCompetition, 2004]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: returnedToCompetition Context triple: [Bethany Hamilton, returnedToCompetition, 2004]
-
A.
returnToPlayCompetitionFor
Indicates that an entity resumes participating in a competition or match on behalf of another entity (such as a team, club, or organization).
-
B.
returnedToTeam
Indicates that an individual who was previously away has come back to rejoin the same team.
-
C.
competedAs
Indicates that an entity participated in a competition or contest in the role, category, or capacity specified by another entity.
-
D.
competedFor
Indicates that an entity took part in a contest, rivalry, or competition in pursuit of another entity (such as a prize, position, or resource).
-
E.
hasCompetition
Indicates that one entity is in a state of rivalry or contest with another entity, typically competing for the same goal, resource, or advantage.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454b4ae481908967426dd37284d6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b356fb69a0819099f0005779f4fcac |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b3563bf4f8819081726cde3a34460b |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:11 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b356f9afc48190acb50c45a310e072 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m.