Triple
T445430
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Short Parliament |
E7005
|
entity |
| Predicate | parliamentaryGrievances |
P13287
|
FINISHED |
| Object | abuses of royal prerogative |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: abuses of royal prerogative | Statement: [Short Parliament, parliamentaryGrievances, abuses of royal prerogative]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: parliamentaryGrievances Context triple: [Short Parliament, parliamentaryGrievances, abuses of royal prerogative]
-
A.
parliamentaryContext
Indicates that an action, statement, or event occurs within, relates to, or is governed by the procedures and norms of a parliamentary setting or legislative body.
-
B.
parliamentClaim
Indicates that a parliamentary body formally asserts, states, or maintains a particular proposition, position, or fact.
-
C.
parliamentaryHouse
Indicates that one entity functions as a parliamentary chamber or house within the legislative system of another entity.
-
D.
politicalRationale
Indicates the reasoning, justification, or strategic considerations underlying a political decision, stance, or action.
-
E.
impeachmentGrounds
Indicates that a particular reason, action, or circumstance serves as a valid basis or justification for initiating impeachment proceedings against an officeholder.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e4676c81909ea0dbdecac0687c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ef479ec08190a659eead6eb0d4d0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2eddfb5508190a4e06e1b260d8b2b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2eeb9e6b0819093863959a6e5730a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.