Triple
T4425609
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DEC Alpha servers |
E95199
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorArchitecture |
P50932
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Intel Itanium-based servers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Intel Itanium-based servers | Statement: [DEC Alpha servers, successorArchitecture, Intel Itanium-based servers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorArchitecture Context triple: [DEC Alpha servers, successorArchitecture, Intel Itanium-based servers]
-
A.
subsequentArchitect
Indicates that one architect comes after another in a temporal or sequential order, such as in a series of design or construction roles.
-
B.
successorSystem
chosen
Indicates that one system directly follows and replaces another in function, role, or version.
-
C.
successorCulture
Indicates that one culture directly follows and continues or replaces another culture in time, inheriting or building upon its traditions or characteristics.
-
D.
successorSoftware
Indicates that one software product directly follows and replaces another as its newer version or update.
-
E.
successorConcept
Indicates that one concept directly follows and replaces another in a sequence, versioning, or conceptual progression.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453c2a0c8190926b574c90766db9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3554e40ec8190982acc0948da2f42 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f5eabe88190a12b244ea71e46d6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:30 p.m.