Triple

T4416598
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Literate Programming E94988 entity
Predicate languageAgnostic P34874 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Literate Programming, languageAgnostic, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageAgnostic
Context triple: [Literate Programming, languageAgnostic, true]
  • A. languageNeutral
    Indicates that the relationship or action is independent of any specific natural language, applying uniformly across different linguistic contexts.
  • B. programming
    Indicates that an entity writes, develops, or modifies software or code, typically using a programming language to create or control computer programs.
  • C. isProgrammingLanguageIndependent chosen
    Indicates that something (such as a concept, algorithm, or interface) does not depend on any specific programming language and can be applied or used across different languages.
  • D. programmingLanguage
    Indicates that one entity is a programming language used to create, control, or interact with the other entity.
  • E. code
    Indicates that an entity writes, develops, or produces computer software or source code.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3453a36908190b95a79a297ca083c completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b3551afb448190a2ce2000193808ac completed March 13, 2026, 12:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f5d0c54819085c08533bb58030a completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:29 p.m.