Triple
T4411871
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japanese Brazilians |
E94868
|
entity |
| Predicate | cuisineFusion |
P39848
|
FINISHED |
| Object | temaki adapted to Brazilian tastes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: temaki adapted to Brazilian tastes | Statement: [Japanese Brazilians, cuisineFusion, temaki adapted to Brazilian tastes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cuisineFusion Context triple: [Japanese Brazilians, cuisineFusion, temaki adapted to Brazilian tastes]
-
A.
cuisine
Indicates the type or style of food traditionally associated with or served by an entity (such as a restaurant or region).
-
B.
cuisineType
Indicates the type or style of food associated with an entity, such as a restaurant or dish.
-
C.
cuisineInfluence
chosen
Indicates that one cuisine has had a notable impact on the development, style, or characteristics of another cuisine.
-
D.
traditionalCuisine
Indicates that an entity is associated with the customary or historically rooted style of cooking and food preparation characteristic of a particular culture, region, or community.
-
E.
sharesCuisineWith
Indicates that two entities offer or are associated with the same type or style of cuisine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34539638c8190abfea3eb29425210 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b354e656dc819093ca8395d7334006 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 12:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f5d0c54819085c08533bb58030a |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:29 p.m.