Triple

T4411066
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hawaiian alphabet E94853 entity
Predicate hasLimitedConsonantInventory P56111 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Hawaiian alphabet, hasLimitedConsonantInventory, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLimitedConsonantInventory
Context triple: [Hawaiian alphabet, hasLimitedConsonantInventory, true]
  • A. hasConsonantPhonemes
    Indicates that an entity possesses or includes one or more consonant phonemes in its phonological system.
  • B. hasVowelSystem
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular system or pattern of vowel sounds (a structured set of vowel phonemes or contrasts).
  • C. hasConsonantLengthContrast
    Indicates that a language distinguishes meaning between words based on differences in the length or duration of consonant sounds.
  • D. hasPhonemeInventory
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific set or system of distinct speech sounds (phonemes) used in its language.
  • E. hasConsonantHarmony
    Indicates that the entities are related by a pattern where consonants within a linguistic unit adjust to share similar features, creating consonant harmony.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b34539638c8190abfea3eb29425210 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b354e4c58c8190b4190aad3095a1dd completed March 13, 2026, 12:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f5b36a881909bf2e970aa523390 completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b3509997208190933f167f7e20ccfa completed March 12, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:29 p.m.