Triple

T4399214
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Simpson–Bowles deficit reduction plan E99570 entity
Predicate proposedEntitlementChange P21476 FINISHED
Object Social Security reform LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Social Security reform | Statement: [Simpson–Bowles deficit reduction plan, proposedEntitlementChange, Social Security reform]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedEntitlementChange
Context triple: [Simpson–Bowles deficit reduction plan, proposedEntitlementChange, Social Security reform]
  • A. claimsToModify
    Indicates that one entity asserts it can change, alter, or adjust another entity or its properties.
  • B. proposedAmendment chosen
    Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
  • C. changeReason
    Indicates the reason or justification for a modification or change made to an entity or its state.
  • D. mayAmend
    Indicates that one party has the authority or permission to modify, revise, or change something that already exists.
  • E. changePolicy
    Indicates that an entity modifies, replaces, or updates an existing policy governing rules, procedures, or behaviors.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b345506b408190b0e3dee616738a7d completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b352cc4ab081908bc45d2f76cd4da8 completed March 12, 2026, 11:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f597998819092477efdedb51427 completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:20 p.m.